Who is to Blame?
A
sermon delivered by Rev. Peter T. Atkinson
August
21, 2016
at
Gordonsville Presbyterian Church, Gordonsville, Virginia
Romans 8: 1-8
Let us pray,
Help us to see despite
our eyes
Help us to think outside
of our minds
Help us to be more than
our lives
For your eyes show the
way
Your
mind knows the truth
Your
being is the life.
Amen.
There
is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. 2 For
the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from
the law of sin and of death. 3 For God has done what the law,
weakened by the flesh, could not do: by sending his own Son in the likeness of
sinful flesh, and to deal with sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, 4 so
that the just requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not
according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. 5 For those
who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but
those who live according to the Spirit set their minds on the things
of the Spirit.6 To set the mind on the flesh is death, but to
set the mind on the Spirit is life and peace. 7 For this reason
the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God; it does not submit to
God’s law—indeed it cannot, 8 and those who are in the flesh
cannot please God.
This summer I have found
that the villains in Shakespeare have been the most interesting to work with.
It was great to work with Richard III all those weeks ago, and then Macbeth of
course, and Shylock last week, but I think this mornings’, Edmund from King
Lear has been my favorite to wrestle with. He is the bastard son of Gloucester
in King Lear, and his villainous plotting and scheming live in the sub plot of
the play. While the title character Lear divides his kingdom between his two
daughters who say they love him but don’t, Edmund is working to supplant his
half brother Edgar, and cause a little chaos along the way. Shakespeare creates
him as a character who is just created to be a villain. Everything about him
screams villain, and he lives into the stereotype of the illegitimate son. . .
but in this speech he is saying that is has nothing to do with being
illegitimate, it has nothing to do with him being a bastard, he says that he
wants to make it clear that he is evil by his own devising, by his own choice,
and that the stars and his birth have nothing to do with it. In other words, he
is claiming that he is very much in control of himself and his fate. Let’s take
a look.
This is the excellent
foppery of the world, that, when we are
sick in fortune, often the surfeit of our own behaviour, we make
guilty of our disasters the sun, the moon, and the stars; as if
we were villains on necessity; fools by heavenly compulsion;
knaves, thieves, and treachers by spherical pre-dominance;
drunkards, liars, and adulterers by an enforc'd obedience of
planetary influence; and all that we are evil in, by a divine
thrusting on. An admirable evasion of whore-master man, to lay
his goatish disposition to the charge of a star! My father
compounded with my mother under the Dragon's Tail, and my
nativity was under Ursa Major, so that it follows I am rough and
lecherous. Fut! I should have been that I am, had the
maidenliest star in the firmament twinkled on my bastardizing.
Edgar- and pat! he comes, like the catastrophe of the old comedy. My
cue is villainous melancholy, with a sigh like Tom o' Bedlam.
O, these eclipses do portend these divisions! Fa, sol, la, mi.
sick in fortune, often the surfeit of our own behaviour, we make
guilty of our disasters the sun, the moon, and the stars; as if
we were villains on necessity; fools by heavenly compulsion;
knaves, thieves, and treachers by spherical pre-dominance;
drunkards, liars, and adulterers by an enforc'd obedience of
planetary influence; and all that we are evil in, by a divine
thrusting on. An admirable evasion of whore-master man, to lay
his goatish disposition to the charge of a star! My father
compounded with my mother under the Dragon's Tail, and my
nativity was under Ursa Major, so that it follows I am rough and
lecherous. Fut! I should have been that I am, had the
maidenliest star in the firmament twinkled on my bastardizing.
Edgar- and pat! he comes, like the catastrophe of the old comedy. My
cue is villainous melancholy, with a sigh like Tom o' Bedlam.
O, these eclipses do portend these divisions! Fa, sol, la, mi.
Do you hear him, this man who is out to
get revenge for his low station, out to undo what he feels is the unfair
treatment he has received from life? He is exactly what everyone thinks he should
be, what the society would suggest that he would be, lower in character, evil,
different, but at the same time he is saying that it, his birth, has nothing to
do with who he is. He is in control. He is free to choose. He is his own man,
and it is his choice to do exactly what he is doing. Himself and not his birth
has placed the chip on his shoulder. He has emancipated himself from the
restrictions of the universe, and is free to be whatever he chooses, and he
chooses to be evil. . . ironic huh. Is this the picture of the control that sin
has over us, blinding us to our inability to do anything else, be anything
else, but at the same time claiming the opposite, claiming that we are actually
in control, blinded to our slavery to sin. Is this what Paul means when he
writes about the weakened flesh that cannot live to the law, or the idea of
setting your mind on the flesh and being unable to live into the gifts of the
spirit.
It is something I hear all the time from
my students, especially on their Final Exam, when I ask them all kinds of
thinking type questions, like are you a good person. . .or what is evil, or
what is the purpose of education?. . . the one question that is always last on that
test is “who are you?” And they almost all say. I am me, and no one can
determine who I am except me. I am in control. I make the rules. I determine
it. . . .or my favorite. . . I am going about the business of “just doing me.” I
decided to find one that was a good example, and it just happened to be on top.
. . it said “I am (The student’s name) and I am the one who determines who I
am. Nobody will tell me what I should or shouldn’t do. I control my own
destiny.” This is the typical line, sometime in our conversations I always ask
them about the specifics. . . okay you are you, then how come you can’t get
your homework done. . . because you tell me you want to. . . you tell me you
can do it. . . but at the same time it isn’t done. Why is that? Why is it that
where there is a will. . . or at least a supposed will. . . there isn’t a way.
. . Why is that when you want to do something, or at least you say you do, you
can’t get it done? And it isn’t just kids right. . . we all fall into that
place. We all find ourselves with great intentions but then the follow through
isn’t always there. We want to lose weight, we know that we should pass on the
ice cream, or cut down on the salt, or on the French fries completely. . . but
we simply can’t. Why? And it is often more important things, too, like
relationships and where we are in life. There is something broken in us that
does not allow us to always choose the path that we know is the best for us,
and that we in our heart seem to desire. How strange that truly is. It is the
picture of fragmentation and brokenness. This is our broken selves coming
through, and this I believe is where Edmund is, ironically saying he is his own
man, vowing to the fact, but all the while falling into the trap of his broken
nature.
So what is the step forward? How do we fix
this malady? How do we repair the brokenness? How do we make whole what has
been fragmented? Paul speaks to this dilemma directly in his letter to the
Romans, and chapter 8 is probably one of the most succinct parts.
There
is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.
No
condemnation. . . stop worrying about the results of your actions, it is not a
step forward. . . guilt is not a step forward, why because worry over
condemnation is a concern of the flesh and a concern of the self. . . Christ is
setting us free from such things. You see Paul goes on:
2 For
the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from
the law of sin and of death. 3 For God has done what the law,
weakened by the flesh, could not do: by sending his own Son in the likeness of
sinful flesh, and to deal with sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, 4 so
that the just requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not
according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.
Christ
did what we could not do. He went into the desert with the intention of
following God, and when the devil tempted, when that voice of brokenness reared
its head, he sent it away. Three times. It did not matter how tired he was, how
hungry he was, how consumed by this incarnate flesh he was, Christ stood up to
temptation and stayed connected to God. He fulfilled the law, and the desert
was not enough, he kept this faithful journey through the desert of hatred and
oppression and smallness, all the way to the Cross, and proclaimed it
accomplished, then rose from the dead and returned to us.
5 For
those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the
flesh, but those who live according to the Spirit set their minds on
the things of the Spirit.
Setting
our minds on the things of the flesh. . . what are those things? What does it
mean to set our mind instead on the things of the spirit? Where does that occur
with Edmund? He sets his mind on envy of his brother, he sets his mind on
revenge, to take what his brother has, and it doesn’t even seem like he wants
the things, he just wants to have them so his brother does not. . . again the
brokenness of the flesh. . . is setting our minds on the flesh setting them on
the brokenness. . . and then the opposite is to set it on the wholeness. You see
Edmund seeks to deny an aspect of his life. . . he says it has nothing to do
with him, but it all does. . . everything from his conception to himself to now
has something to do with him, that is the thing about saying, I’m going to do
me, I’m the one who determines my life. . . how much of life, your life, are
you then denying because there is so much more to you than just you. . . there
are all the people that have been put into your life, there are all the
experiences that you have had. . . they all shape you, they all make a
difference in who you are, and there is not many of them that you are in
control of. . . The American Theologian Jonathan Edwards, when writing a
treatise on Free Will and God’s Sovereignty talked about this idea, which he
called means, that God shapes our lives many different ways, there are so many
aspects to our lives that we don’t have control over. . . and to say that we
have a free and independent will is ridiculous because we do not shape all
these aspects. . . Is living to
wholeness, being awake and aware of all of the self, not just the some. . .
while at the same time living to the spirit is understanding the
interconnectedness of it all because it is God shaping that interconnectedness.
. . and then living into the spirit is about loving because loving looks
outside of the self to the relationships of life. It’s opening ourselves up to
the actual connectedness of ourselves that includes everything, not just me
doing me, but me doing us, and you and I, and it all, by the way that our lives
are intertwined. Understanding this connectivity makes us more than anything we
think we have determining ourselves in our brains.
6 To
set the mind on the flesh is death, but to set the mind on the Spirit is life
and peace.
Our flesh ends, but all
of our relationships, the outward, connected, that is what lives on, and it
mirrors the Trinitarian interconnectedness of father son and holy spirit. And
we are made whole in our connection.
7 For
this reason the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God; it does not
submit to God’s law—indeed it cannot, 8 and those who are in
the flesh cannot please God.
Edmund is hostile to God in declaring his
emancipated place in the world, his freedom in the world to do and be whatever
he wants. . . he is being hostile to God, and is being hostile to those parts
of himself that he would like to ignore and be free from. . . and our culture,
shown by those teenagers and what they have been taught is hostile to God,
because they are saying I control who I am, I am in control, I make of myself
whatever I want, I declare independence from all the structures at place in the
world that have ever been. We take the Declaration of Independence out of
context so often, not free and independent to be whoever we want, but instead
to be whatever we are, what we were created to be. I am not sure exactly where
God is leading us, but I have faith that it is good, and that he is leading us
to life and peace.
I end every Sunday School class with this
prayer, and I’d like to end this sermon in the same place. . . Almighty God
thank you that we have been brought
together today to grow closer to one another and closer to you. Bless us on our
interconnected journey together towards you. In Christ’s name we pray, Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment